Sizelabs vs CubiScan
Compare Sizelabs and CubiScan warehouse dimensioners. See accuracy, pricing, features, and which is right for your operation.
Overview
CubiScan
CubiScan has been building warehouse dimensioners since 1987. They offer 15+ models using ultrasonic, infrared, and LiDAR technologies. Different models handle different item types β ultrasonic for boxes, infrared for irregular items, LiDAR for pallets.
Sizelabs
Sizelabs builds AI-powered dimensioning systems using computer vision. Our platform handles all item types β boxes, polybags, irregular shapes, dark materials β across static, in-motion, and conveyor configurations. 250+ installations across 5 countries. NTEP certified.
Quick Comparison
| Feature | Sizelabs | CubiScan |
|---|---|---|
| Parcel accuracy | Β±0.25" | Β±0.1" |
| Pallet accuracy | Β±0.5" (Β±1" on black wrap) | Not published |
| Handles polybags | β Yes | Only with $15K+ infrared models |
| Handles irregular shapes | β Yes | Only with $15K+ infrared models |
| Handles black shrink wrap | β Yes | Struggles with ultrasonic |
| Static systems | β Yes | β Yes |
| In-motion systems | β Yes | β Yes |
| Conveyor integration | β Yes | β Yes |
| NTEP certified | β Yes | β Yes |
| Pricing published | β Yes | No β call for quote |
| Support included | β Yes | Extra (annual maintenance) |
| AI/workflow expansion | Yes (Operator AI, Assistant) | No |
Key Differences
1. Material Versatility
CubiScan's most affordable dimensioners (100, 110, 150) use ultrasonic technology. This works well for standard cardboard boxes but cannot measure polybags, apparel, irregular shapes, or foam materials. Their own documentation states these models aren't suitable for "eaches, apparel, or noncuboidal items."
To measure irregular items with CubiScan, you need their infrared models (325) which cost $15,000-20,000. Sizelabs uses computer vision that handles all material types with a single system.
2. Total Cost
Parcel Dimensioning
Pallet Dimensioning
3. Accuracy Trade-off
For standard cardboard boxes, CubiScan's Β±0.1" accuracy is tighter than Sizelabs' Β±0.25". However, Sizelabs can measure items that CubiScan's ultrasonic models cannot measure at all. If you need the absolute tightest tolerance on boxes only, CubiScan is more precise. If you have mixed inventory, Sizelabs is more versatile.
4. Beyond Dimensioning
Sizelabs offers AI-powered expansions that turn your dimensioner into a foundation for warehouse intelligence, not a dead end:
- Operator AI: Intelligent assistance for dimensioning operators
- Warehouse Assistant: Workflow automation beyond dimensioning
Choose Sizelabs if:
- βYou have mixed inventory (boxes, polybags, irregular items)
- βYou need pallet dimensioning without $30K+ upfront
- βYou want transparent pricing with support included
- βYou're interested in AI workflow capabilities
- βYou want to integrate with or replace existing dimensioners
CubiScan may be better if:
- βYou only measure standard cardboard boxes
- βYou need the absolute tightest accuracy (Β±0.1")
- βYou prefer a big one-time purchase + support fees over monthly fees
- βYou have a specialized application they've built a niche product for